Design of components
3 posters
Page 1 of 1
Design of components
I've opened this new topic to invite a bit of discussion about the design, construction and components of guitars in general. To start things off, I'd like to tackle a question posed by Jim recently. This concerns guitars with a separate bridge and tailpiece, and the question is: why is the bridge sometimes not set parallel with the tailpiece?
I'm sure everyone knows about adjusting the bridge, and that there is always an overall angle to the line of the bridge saddles when intonation has been correctly set. The bridge saddles need to have sufficient movement to allow this to be achieved, plus a bit of leeway in both directions to allow for variations such as different gauge strings. However if most of the string contact points are to one side of the centre line of the bridge then the string tension will cause a twisting force. This could bend the two bridge mounts if they are not very strong (I've seen this happen on a poorly-designed bass bridge). The standard tune-o-matic type bridge is not very wide, so it needs to be positioned close to where the intonation will dictate, which is at an angle. Some bridges are built wider and stronger (as on my Rainbow and Ibanez guitars – see pics) so that they can be mounted straight, which looks better but costs more, and that's probably what it's all about.
I'm sure everyone knows about adjusting the bridge, and that there is always an overall angle to the line of the bridge saddles when intonation has been correctly set. The bridge saddles need to have sufficient movement to allow this to be achieved, plus a bit of leeway in both directions to allow for variations such as different gauge strings. However if most of the string contact points are to one side of the centre line of the bridge then the string tension will cause a twisting force. This could bend the two bridge mounts if they are not very strong (I've seen this happen on a poorly-designed bass bridge). The standard tune-o-matic type bridge is not very wide, so it needs to be positioned close to where the intonation will dictate, which is at an angle. Some bridges are built wider and stronger (as on my Rainbow and Ibanez guitars – see pics) so that they can be mounted straight, which looks better but costs more, and that's probably what it's all about.
David_A- Senior Member
- Number of posts : 129
Age : 75
Location : Cheshire
Registration date : 2014-10-26
Re: Design of components
They're wider to compensate for slight manufacturing tolerances.
+/- a mm or so.
+/- a mm or so.
Re: Design of components
The Rainbow bridge and tailpiece are made from 'pot' metal which is very cheap.
The tailpiece on the Rainbow,Prestige,Thunder II etc. are all the same. The tailpiece is extremely vulnerable to bumps and bangs and will snap at the weakest point ie. A+B strings. Have a look how thin they are from below.
Many folks have been looking for replacements due to breakages.
Here's a link to a fix.
http://forum.westoneguitars.net/t5061-swiftlock-tailpiece
The tailpiece on the Rainbow,Prestige,Thunder II etc. are all the same. The tailpiece is extremely vulnerable to bumps and bangs and will snap at the weakest point ie. A+B strings. Have a look how thin they are from below.
Many folks have been looking for replacements due to breakages.
Here's a link to a fix.
http://forum.westoneguitars.net/t5061-swiftlock-tailpiece
Re: Design of components
It mainly has to do with compensation in order to get the intonation correct. Most acoustic saddles on good quality guitars are angled simply because there is no way to physically adjust the strings individually as with an ABR-1 or Nashville style bridge. The angle is determined by the scale of the guitar with G-scale (Gibson) requiring more compensation that an F-scale (Fender).Jim wrote:...I never understood why some bridges aren't mounted parallel to the tail-piece on some guitars...
What is the logic here? Anybody?
If you look at David's 2nd pic above, in particular, you'll see that while the bridge is parallel to the stop tail, the saddles in fact are angled in order to compensate.
_________________
"A little song. A little dance. A little seltzer down your pants." -Chuckles the Clown
GUITARS : https://legend.barryeames.com
MUSIC/PIX/VIDEOS: https://getback.barryeames.com (including Spectrum ST)
Re: Design of components
Looks like a wound G in the 2nd. picture.Barry wrote:It mainly has to do with compensation in order to get the intonation correct. Most acoustic saddles on good quality guitars are angled simply because there is no way to physically adjust the strings individually as with an ABR-1 or Nashville style bridge. The angle is determined by the scale of the guitar with G-scale (Gibson) requiring more compensation that an F-scale (Fender).Jim wrote:...I never understood why some bridges aren't mounted parallel to the tail-piece on some guitars...
What is the logic here? Anybody?
If you look at David's 2nd pic above, in particular, you'll see that while the bridge is parallel to the stop tail, the saddles in fact are angled in order to compensate.
Re: Design of components
Pic 1 is the Rainbow, which has a plain 3rd. You can see that my intonation adjustments have resulted in a big step in the angle between the 3rd and 4th strings because 1,2,3 are plain and 4,5,6 are wound.
Pic 2 is the Ibanez Artist, which also has a plain 3rd. It looks like the bridge may need a bit of adjustment but the intonation seems fine so I haven't changed it. I must admit I bought the guitar as an investment and it is in such mint condition that I'm reluctant to use it for gigs, which is a pity because it's a superb guitar. I'll try and post some more pics of bridges to show some other variations.
Pic 2 is the Ibanez Artist, which also has a plain 3rd. It looks like the bridge may need a bit of adjustment but the intonation seems fine so I haven't changed it. I must admit I bought the guitar as an investment and it is in such mint condition that I'm reluctant to use it for gigs, which is a pity because it's a superb guitar. I'll try and post some more pics of bridges to show some other variations.
David_A- Senior Member
- Number of posts : 129
Age : 75
Location : Cheshire
Registration date : 2014-10-26
Re: Design of components
I'm shocked to read Westbone's (Damian's?) comments on the fragility of Westone bridges and tailpieces. I always assumed the quality of them was a bit better than the stock ones. I've not had any breakage problems with any bridges or tailpieces myself; the only problem I've had is the saddles wearing down where I put the back of my hand on them to damp the strings. I notice that some people go to the trouble of getting replacement parts in brass; does this make much difference to the guitar's playability?
David_A- Senior Member
- Number of posts : 129
Age : 75
Location : Cheshire
Registration date : 2014-10-26
Re: Design of components
Sorry, not sure what you're asking about there. The tailpiece has the normal post screws. The bridge has locking screws, which are more unusual.Westbone wrote:What are the post centers on the Ibanez stop tailpiece?
Hey, I've just become a Westone Nut! Love it!
David_A- Senior Member
- Number of posts : 129
Age : 75
Location : Cheshire
Registration date : 2014-10-26
Re: Design of components
The distance from the center of one post to the other.David_A wrote:Sorry, not sure what you're asking about there. The tailpiece has the normal post screws. The bridge has locking screws, which are more unusual.Westbone wrote:What are the post centers on the Ibanez stop tailpiece?
Hey, I've just become a Westone Nut! Love it!
You nut...
Re: Design of components
It's the Swiftlock tailpiece that's the Achilles heal.David_A wrote:I'm shocked to read Westbone's (Damian's?) comments on the fragility of Westone bridges and tailpieces. I always assumed the quality of them was a bit better than the stock ones. I've not had any breakage problems with any bridges or tailpieces myself; the only problem I've had is the saddles wearing down where I put the back of my hand on them to damp the strings. I notice that some people go to the trouble of getting replacement parts in brass; does this make much difference to the guitar's playability
Brass is an easier material to work with.
Re: Design of components
"It's the Swiftlock tailpiece that's the Achilles heal."
Self-healing tailpiece? Now that would be useful!
(sorry couldn't resist!)
BTW, I've put the Ibanez away for now, but will check next time I get it out (the guitar, that is).
Self-healing tailpiece? Now that would be useful!
(sorry couldn't resist!)
BTW, I've put the Ibanez away for now, but will check next time I get it out (the guitar, that is).
David_A- Senior Member
- Number of posts : 129
Age : 75
Location : Cheshire
Registration date : 2014-10-26
Re: Design of components
Done! CLICK HERE to continue the discussion of bridge types.Westbone wrote:Yes seen all those types of bridges, nothing new!
None are Westone though.
Maybe you should put this in the Non Westone section.
_________________
"A little song. A little dance. A little seltzer down your pants." -Chuckles the Clown
GUITARS : https://legend.barryeames.com
MUSIC/PIX/VIDEOS: https://getback.barryeames.com (including Spectrum ST)
Similar topics
» ~ New possible SHIRT design: Thoughts?
» Westone - US Design - Development History
» Westone Logo Design information
» The NEXT shirt design - your input welcomed
» Westone/Electra Dynasty design beginning?
» Westone - US Design - Development History
» Westone Logo Design information
» The NEXT shirt design - your input welcomed
» Westone/Electra Dynasty design beginning?
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|