Thunder Jet Vs Thunder 1.
+2
Meadows
Sollophonic
6 posters
Page 1 of 1
Thunder Jet Vs Thunder 1.
I have two Westone Thunders, a Jet and a Thunder 1.
The Thunder Jet is original and has had a tough life, dents and gouges in the body and neck, but it plays and sounds well, and I have very little cash invested in it because I paid only £50 for it. It has the Hammer pickups in it apparently.
The Thunder 1 is a different thing altogether, it is a bit of a mix of parts. The neck, body and bridge are off one Thunder 1A guitar, the rest is parts stripped out of an older black Thunder 1, which had a cracked headstock when I bought it.
This one has the MMK 45 pickups in it.
Thing is I am stripping back my guitar collection, and I have to choose between these two.
I actually prefer the neck on the Thunder Jet, and I also like the tone of it too. Despite the great love of the MMK45s, the Hammer pickups in the Jet just sound fuller, richer and better than the MMK45. I know they shouldn't. but they do.
The Thunder 1 looks great, it is in good condition, but the whole guitar isn't original, as the active electronics are long gone, the rest is not the original guitar, so it is ripe for being sold or even parted out and sold on.
Maybe I should try the MMK45s in the Thunder Jet, but two things I have to consider are 1) are the MMK 45s really that much better, if at all than the Hammers and b) can I bring myself to sell on a nice looking, but parts Westone or part out an unoriginal Westone?
First world problems, even;-)
The Thunder Jet is original and has had a tough life, dents and gouges in the body and neck, but it plays and sounds well, and I have very little cash invested in it because I paid only £50 for it. It has the Hammer pickups in it apparently.
The Thunder 1 is a different thing altogether, it is a bit of a mix of parts. The neck, body and bridge are off one Thunder 1A guitar, the rest is parts stripped out of an older black Thunder 1, which had a cracked headstock when I bought it.
This one has the MMK 45 pickups in it.
Thing is I am stripping back my guitar collection, and I have to choose between these two.
I actually prefer the neck on the Thunder Jet, and I also like the tone of it too. Despite the great love of the MMK45s, the Hammer pickups in the Jet just sound fuller, richer and better than the MMK45. I know they shouldn't. but they do.
The Thunder 1 looks great, it is in good condition, but the whole guitar isn't original, as the active electronics are long gone, the rest is not the original guitar, so it is ripe for being sold or even parted out and sold on.
Maybe I should try the MMK45s in the Thunder Jet, but two things I have to consider are 1) are the MMK 45s really that much better, if at all than the Hammers and b) can I bring myself to sell on a nice looking, but parts Westone or part out an unoriginal Westone?
First world problems, even;-)
Sollophonic- Senior Member
- Number of posts : 199
Age : 60
Location : Skipton, North Yorkshire
Registration date : 2010-10-04
Re: Thunder Jet Vs Thunder 1.
For my two pennies worth, I think we all have bought and owned non original or retro fitted examples of guitars just to experience a taste of that model maybe. At the end of the day I think it comes to down to which bass feels and sounds best or right to you at this moment with the music your playing.
Maybe to help you decide, have both basses side by side in the room where you play most and after a few weeks, see which one becomes your go to bass...might help
Maybe to help you decide, have both basses side by side in the room where you play most and after a few weeks, see which one becomes your go to bass...might help
Meadows- Financial supporter
- Number of posts : 593
Location : North Herts
Registration date : 2013-01-19
Re: Thunder Jet Vs Thunder 1.
Just to clarify, they are both 6 string guitars
picture host
photo upload sites
picture host
photo upload sites
Sollophonic- Senior Member
- Number of posts : 199
Age : 60
Location : Skipton, North Yorkshire
Registration date : 2010-10-04
Re: Thunder Jet Vs Thunder 1.
The clue was in the pickups right!!!.......
Meadows- Financial supporter
- Number of posts : 593
Location : North Herts
Registration date : 2013-01-19
Re: Thunder Jet Vs Thunder 1.
Meadows wrote:The clue was in the pickups right!!!.......
I guess so, but I tell you I'd rock a Westone bass and they go for less money than the guitars too.
And I keep a lookout for 'em too, a basic Westone bass will walk all over most basses available for a similar price new these days.
Kicking myself for missing out on a locally listed Thunder 1 bass at a great price, recently.
Sollophonic- Senior Member
- Number of posts : 199
Age : 60
Location : Skipton, North Yorkshire
Registration date : 2010-10-04
Re: Thunder Jet Vs Thunder 1.
Firstly, I think you'll find that the Hammer I p'ups are, in fact 45's... and if I had to choose between a black guitar and anything else, then the black guitar is on it's way to someplace else!!
However, if you just sit and play both guitars - perhaps blindfolded and have your wife hand you them without telling you which is what - then pick the one that 'feels' best to play; easy!!
However, if you just sit and play both guitars - perhaps blindfolded and have your wife hand you them without telling you which is what - then pick the one that 'feels' best to play; easy!!
corsair- Senior Member
- Number of posts : 6352
Age : 65
Location : Mount Hunter, NSW, Australia
Registration date : 2008-04-08
Re: Thunder Jet Vs Thunder 1.
I've never owned a Jet but for my money there are damn few guitars more versatile or comfortable (if a tad heavy) than the IA.
Black guitars are, well...black. What can you say?
The IA has a much classier look, especially when all cleaned up.
Like everyone sez though, it's down to which one speaks to your bad self.
Black guitars are, well...black. What can you say?
The IA has a much classier look, especially when all cleaned up.
Like everyone sez though, it's down to which one speaks to your bad self.
_________________
"A little song. A little dance. A little seltzer down your pants." -Chuckles the Clown
GUITARS : https://legend.barryeames.com
MUSIC/PIX/VIDEOS: https://getback.barryeames.com (including Spectrum ST)
Re: Thunder Jet Vs Thunder 1.
Both the Rail and Quantum bass pickups have MMK45 on the base of the pickup plates.Meadows wrote:The clue was in the pickups right!!!
Have to have a look at my super headless also. Which are apparently the same.
Re: Thunder Jet Vs Thunder 1.
Hey Damian, thanks for the info, didn't realise they put MMK45's in any bass models (the humbucker design makes sense).
Do you think they would have wound or spec'd the pick up any differently to accommodate the lower bass frequencies?
Do you think they would have wound or spec'd the pick up any differently to accommodate the lower bass frequencies?
Meadows- Financial supporter
- Number of posts : 593
Location : North Herts
Registration date : 2013-01-19
Re: Thunder Jet Vs Thunder 1.
I guess maybe I'll try a pickup swap.
In the meantime I might try putting one of the Hammers in this and see what it sounds like;-)
image hosting no sign up
In the meantime I might try putting one of the Hammers in this and see what it sounds like;-)
image hosting no sign up
Sollophonic- Senior Member
- Number of posts : 199
Age : 60
Location : Skipton, North Yorkshire
Registration date : 2010-10-04
Re: Thunder Jet Vs Thunder 1.
Pickup swaps can be a great way to change a guitars character, I agree! Perhaps a less aggressive, slightly underwound pickup might work in the Clipper - or the Thunders! - .... something like the Tonerider ACII?!
I do know I'm a believer after putting one into a Vantage Avenger...
I do know I'm a believer after putting one into a Vantage Avenger...
corsair- Senior Member
- Number of posts : 6352
Age : 65
Location : Mount Hunter, NSW, Australia
Registration date : 2008-04-08
Re: Thunder Jet Vs Thunder 1.
You'll find your Hammer I pickup has MMK45 on the base plateSollophonic wrote:I guess maybe I'll try a pickup swap.
In the meantime I might try putting one of the Hammers in this and see what it sounds like;-)
image hosting no sign up
Re: Thunder Jet Vs Thunder 1.
Hey Sollo, didn't you put a P90 in that Clipper?
What happened to that experiment, no joy?
What happened to that experiment, no joy?
_________________
"A little song. A little dance. A little seltzer down your pants." -Chuckles the Clown
GUITARS : https://legend.barryeames.com
MUSIC/PIX/VIDEOS: https://getback.barryeames.com (including Spectrum ST)
Re: Thunder Jet Vs Thunder 1.
Yep, but the Twelve Gauge sounded better and was much more versatile, especially wired to s series/parallel switch.
P90 was pretty good, but not as much fun as the humbucker.
P90 was pretty good, but not as much fun as the humbucker.
Sollophonic- Senior Member
- Number of posts : 199
Age : 60
Location : Skipton, North Yorkshire
Registration date : 2010-10-04
Re: Thunder Jet Vs Thunder 1.
Yeah, as much as I loves me a P90, it's a bit hard to split one! Carry on.
_________________
"A little song. A little dance. A little seltzer down your pants." -Chuckles the Clown
GUITARS : https://legend.barryeames.com
MUSIC/PIX/VIDEOS: https://getback.barryeames.com (including Spectrum ST)
Re: Thunder Jet Vs Thunder 1.
so, the westone thunder jet in this thread is the one i'm now refurbishing. what a pity he stripped it for parts. and i paid £75+P&P for it too.
monkey- Senior Member
- Number of posts : 180
Registration date : 2017-11-08
Similar topics
» Westone Thunder 3 Guitar Wanted in U.K Can PX a Thunder 1A 1983 Sunset Red or a 1984 Natural Oak plus cash
» Westone Thunder 1 Guitar + Thunder 1A bass (UK Ebay)
» New Thunder 1A (new to me)
» Thunder Jet-V-Thunder Bass???
» Thunder I vs. Thunder II guitars
» Westone Thunder 1 Guitar + Thunder 1A bass (UK Ebay)
» New Thunder 1A (new to me)
» Thunder Jet-V-Thunder Bass???
» Thunder I vs. Thunder II guitars
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum